Bloomberg Quote of the Day: “The wisest mind has something yet to learn.” – George Santayana…smart man, now think how much you and I have left to go! TB
TB’s Quote of the Day: “I don’t get no respect.” -Rodney Dangerfield
…the close as TB will because if he doesn’t it might just ‘sockit to me’, as Aretha Franklin might say. Don’t worry about the open, don’t worry about mid-day just worry about the close and respect it! We could either break out of this four day ceiling (some indices did but so slightly as to cast further doubt on the ability to rally from here), turn turtle and head back down to the bottom of the range…that being the gap created by the April 1 close and the April 2 open…now you wouldn’t want to go long in the morning and have that happen would you?…well, would ya?
If there is one thing…just one thing…you should respect today it is options expiration. While not a triple or quadruple witching it is an important one as the latest wave of the rally from the bottom (March 9), which began with stocks ‘gapping up’ on the open on April 9, closed the gap on Wednesday and is now dependent upon not closing the opening gap from April 2. To be sure, these gaps on the S&P 500 were just 1 point each but technicians value even small gaps in their analysis and in a market that is characterized by thousands of electronic, computer driven, trades every hour…how else do we get volume on the troubled financials (C, BofA, AIG, GE, JPM) ranging from 150 million to over a billion shares a day when the entire volume of the NYSE only averages about 1.5 billion shares? BofA for example had an average volume of about 120 million shares from 1/1508-1/15/09…prior to that it had been around 75 million shares, but since January 15th the average has soared to 505 million shares. The others are proportionately similar. That is why you need to pay attention to options, and when they expire it can be explosive.
However, this time, ever since ‘Good Thursday’ (you remember the big rally on 4/9?), the shorts covered (normally that happens on Tuesday or Wednesday ahead of expiration, so for four days we have been bumping up against the highs…yesterday a few even took out those highs so they will provide initial support but once broken should trigger a wave of selling and since the gap from 4/9 was closed on Wednesday, all we have to hang our hats on is that opening gap. Here are the gaps from April 2, respect them…especially if we close below them (with exception of Dow 30 lower number is prior day’s high):
Dow 30 – 4/16 8125.43. Did not have a true gap on 4/2 but opened 3 points higher (7964-7761), same on 4/9 (7839-7837)
S&P 500 –4/16 865.30; 4/2 (814-813.62), 4/9 (829-828.42)
Nasdaq 100 – 4/16 1353.98; 4/2 (1273-1254.90), 4/9 (1321-1306.40) – most important as it was the leader
Nasdaq Comp – 4/16 1670.44; 4/2 (1580-1551.60), 4/9 (1619-1595.90)
Russell 2000 – 4/16 473.88; 4/2 no gap (429.15-429.51), 4/9 446.95-442.14)
Therefore, it should not be surprising that on the eve of expiry stocks did nothing that was technically significant! A few positives though:
1. The Dow was up on 1.2% above average volume
2. The two Nasdaq indices and the Russell 2000 Small Cap are best performers
3.Advance/Declines and Breadth were solid yesterday
4. New 52 week highs turned positive to new lows again and have been very close. Yesterday it was 32:15 and have been very close since March 12…on 3/11 it was 199:11 negative. This is impressive since at one point this year we had 1954 new lows and only a handful of new lows. Also, given the depth of the selloff it is amazing there are any 52 week highs.
Note that almost the entire range (except about 50 points on the Dow) since 4/9 was on that first day of the rally…we have been treading water ever since.
So just sit back and ignore the comments of the cognizenti and wait for the final act.
————————————————————————————
Nobel laureate Joseph Stieglitz says that the bank rescue plan will fail because like the ties between Paulson and Goldman Sachs, and prior to that of course, Robert Rubin, and a cast of even more, the Obama Administration has ties too close to Wall Street. This is just one of three related top stories on Bloomberg today. The others:
*Congress wants AIG CEO Edward Libby to sell his Goldman Sachs shares ($3 million) as it is a conflict of interest since Goldman Sachs is AIG’s biggest creditor. AIG responded that Libby, who works for $1 a year, took the job as a public service.
*The Lehman bankruptcy worsened the crisis as it was too big to fail. But what are we doing to prevent there being more firms too big to fail?
Now back to Stieglitz who says as most smart people do that the problem banks should be taken over, shareholder wealth wiped out and the assets sold or breaking up the banks into several entities. He says the ties to Wall Street prevent any such solution from even being considered as it is not in the streets best interest and that is what it is all about. More and more people are commenting on or alluding to the oligarchy that has been created between the financial sector interests and Congress’s personal interests. If there is a conflict of interest it is right there and they have proven which way they lean: towards the ones who are making them wealthy, not their constituents…now we are at a crisis point and it is sink or swim for them. Those tea party protests were right: throw them out, throw them ALL out. But then we still have to pay them their retirements…aarrgghh!!!
TB started his career…in banking…37 years ago. At that time John Bunting, CEO of First Pennsylania, was adored as an innovator even more than JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon. He built First Pennsy into a big trading operation…and then it imploded. How many of you have ever heard of John Bunting today? That was a key learning experience for TB. Bankers are good at what they know…and that is lending…lending, that is when it is sane, such as making 80% mortgages and using real financial statements. They can also run good securities trading operations for governments, municipals, and even mortgage obligations. What they are not good at is understanding risk! If they did would they have made those 102% loans was Wells Fargo did (80% first, 20% second, and 2% unsecured), the sell off the subprime mortgage and pray that it will be refinanced soon? They definitely do not understand derivatives…perhaps JPMorgan is an exception but TB doubts it…what they did was control exposure but they still, like AIG and Lehman have layers of offsetting swaps on their books that could blow up on them. Insurers have a better understanding of risk but even they are subject to the 100 year storm.
After reading the above can anyone possibly believe that what we are seeing in the stock market is nothing more than a countertrend rally in a secular bear market?
TB does however believe the ‘fear’ is out of the market reducing the likelihood of a panic, but it is not being replaced by optimism…other than the ‘Kudlowites’ who were never bearish in the first place and want to resume the status quo.
Real estate may have bottomed, as friend in the industry tell him, but how long could they stay weak?…and what could cause prices to rise? These are two distinctly different issues. Year over year last month, San Francisco area real estate prices fell by 46% driven by foreclosure sales which were more than half of total sales.
The argument is that homes are cheap and affordable again…that is if you have 20% down and can qualify for a mortgage. But the other problem is that for prices to rise in real estate a necessary component is rising wages, right? …and that is not going to happen anytime soon…in fact the danger is wage cuts…take it or go get another job. This is particularly true at the local government level…in Vallejo, California, which is in bankruptcy, the judge has set aside the union contracts…including those pertaining to retirement. This is crucial as it opens the door to more bankruptcy filings by municipalities (states cannot declare bankruptcy), follow closely.
IF you can buy a property cheap thru foreclosure, it is possible as a friend in Los Angeles does, to buy it and rent it out for a positive cashflow. But you are still leveraged and if enough of these speculators have other financial problems the situation could worsen.
This is not to discourage readers from investing in real estate…merely to do so with moderation. For first time homebuyers the tax benefits now are huge, especially in California. But consider: IF they buy a home that will reduce other expenditures or consider at least saving…saving is the bane of capitalism…at least American capitalism. Spending is the driver here…and how are we going to regain the level of consumption, or even get close to the historical levels? Buying a new car? How about a two year old model that is cheap and affordable rather than take the big depreciation in the first year? OR how about moving up in class by doing this on the same amount of dollars? The point is things are not going to go back to where they were…and you had better hope they don’t because a long, slow recovery is preferable to resuming our old ways (without the massive financial sector leverage), and then coming right back here in two or three years.
This is not an exaggeration as most or all of the growth we experienced from 2002 to the 2007 peak was due to leverage…that is why the financial sector became more than 40% of the economy…while we didn’t produce anything for all intents and purposes. That means no more mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWS), multiple credit cards, etc.
If you are in your thirty’s, any growth in your 40`1(k) has been wiped out or worse. If you are a baby boomer your retirement budget and plans are changing. If you are already retired it is even worse. So you tell TB where that explosive consumption will come from? Buying at garage sales???
Just a few things to think about. Have a great weekend!
TB
Trader Bill thinks it is clear to anyone reading these missives that they are merely commentaries…as he sees it…and do not necessarily reflect the views of anyone other than his own. Information is gathered from sources he has found reliable, but no guarantees of accuracy are implied. These are merely observations of events in the marketplace offering in an attempt to offer a non-mainstream viewpoint. Hope you find it useful. Copyright TBD Capital LLC, April 17, 2009.