Bloomberg Quote of the Day: “We can draw lessons from the past, but we cannot live in it.” – Lyndon B. Johnson
TB is dueling with Jim Cramer who was a raging bull last Thursday afternoon and said “buy, buy, buy.” TB says bunk despite Cramer citing his years of experience as a successful hedge fund manager. If so, he should at least understand that hedge funds settle T+3 and if he did he would have identified the quarterend phenomena of the past five and now six episodes (only Q4 2008 rallied during it due to the post-election rally). This time will we get a repeat of Q1 a year ago…the April fool’s rally that lasted until May 2 with a double top on May 19, then plunged almost constantly THRU June 30 with another selloff after T+3. That selloff culminated on July 15 before a countertrend rally to July 23. The Dow did not trade above its 40 day moving average once from 5/22 until 8/5/08! Yet no comment from Cramer on this despite yesterday’s big selloff that tested the 40 day moving averages of every major index. That does not bode well for today, quarterend ,but the point is watch it…and watch out!
Key yesterday were the following: While volume was slightly below the 6 month average and above Friday’s level, it was not large enough to indicate a major selloff. But what was important was that after two days of a positive…slightly…ratio of new 52 week highs to lows…it turned negative once again. Advance/Declines and Breadth were negative for a second straight session…only this time decidedly so with NYSE Breadth -20.9x and Nasdaq -5.7x while advance/declines were -7.7:1 and -3.3:1 respectively. Amazing that Cramer sees the above plus the closes just above or in the case of Dow Transports, Utilities, NYSE Energy, and Alternext (formerly AMEX), below! The declines of Friday and Monday wiped out 5 days of gains…9 for Utilities! What should have been disturbing to Cramer was the industrial stocks which had rallied n the wake of financials who gave back the gains thru Thursday…most for no good reason.
Why did this happen? TB calls the Geithner comments and GM change bunk as reasons. The reason was this: they were able to…meaning hedgies…take it down on Friday but only in a minor way as nobody in their right mind wants to go home short over a weekend with all the breaking news…but they did manage to retrace Thursday’s gains. The two events cited above gave them cover to short and that is what they did. You don’t honestly believe that long only managers sell into a quarterend do you? Of course not, which makes the phenomenon of 5 of the last 6 quarters even more significant. Remember, hedge funds are leveraged, and continually trying to reduce it or are forced to meet withdrawals. Also, they are judged on absolute returns (meaning only positive is a good thing), not relative, like mutual funds and conventional money managers. IF, and this is most of them, they are posting negative returns the best they can hope for is to excel over conventional money managers…what better way than to drive stocks down after the last day for T+3 settlement, which was March 26…coincident with the high?
TB is not saying that we will see another downleg…just that that is the way to play it. Note on the way up TB did not recommend buying as it was merely a countertrend rally. Cramer on the other hand recommended buying after Thursday’s high…TB
…yesterday’s firing of Rick Wagoner as CEO of GM was a warning shot across the bow to boards of directors to exercise power over the CEO and to represent the interests of shareholders and in this case the taxpayers…not the government as ultimately, who is going to pick up the tab? Why Wagoner? How can the board fire or exercise control over the CEO when he is also the Chairman? This is not unique. TB has pointed out GE and how not only is Jeffrey Immelt Chairman and CEO but four executive vice presidents are vice chairmen? BofA’s Ken Lewis is another Chairman and CEO.
Is it any wonder that corporate boards do not represent the interests of the shareholders? Also which shareholders are they representing? Activist hedge funds who threatened them and encouraged five years of record stock buybacks as opposed to dividends so they
(and the CEO) could get immediate gratification? Talk about a no-brainer. Whatever happened to long term investors? Buy and hold types or institutional investors who at least held until they saw problems arising. That was a primary reason for the SEC and others saying shareholders should not appoint their own slate of directors…after all what do they know? Even shareholder initiatives were largely ignored even though they had large majorities favoring them. Many of these concerned executive compensation…now we are griping that the federal government is telling them what to do.
Yesterday, Obama stated that this is not going to be procedure but that it was due to management wanting new thinking. The entire history of the US auto industry is people coming up thru the ranks…and yet the only meaningful improvement came from Lee Iacocca being fired at Ford and going to Chrysler wherein he saved the company with innovation. So what did GM do? Replace him with Fritz Henderson, another old timer. At least they split the Chairman/CEO responsibilities as Citi did, and maed Kent Kresa , also a career GM guy board chairman.
On January 29, Aubrey McClendon also, Chairman, CEO and Co-Founder of Chesapeake Energy (CHK), appeared on Cramer who raved about him and his company, In an incredibly candid interview, McClendon said he had so much confidence in the company that he bought stock on margin (2,169,129 holdings as of 1/3/09 including a purchase of 244,840 in Q4…was that the margin amount?). He then said perhaps he shouldn’t have been so optimistic as he had margin calls…big margin calls…so big that he sold 94% of his holding or about 2 million shares to meet those calls in a declining market! Yet Cramer did not call him on it at the time. At the end of the month the Board renewed McClendon’s contract with a $75 million retention bonus and he has to stay for five years. But why did Cramer never question this? Haven’t we seen what happens when CEO’s did this in the past? We most certainly did and it not confidence in yourself of your company, it is speculating with shareholders money! How so? Because when the CEO is unable to meet the margin calls the stock must be sold thus driving the price lower and negatively impacting all shareholders! On 1/6/09 CHK traded as high as $19.78, rebounding from the 12/5/08 low of $9.84. It then declined to $13.50 on 1/23 before rebounding…after Mr. McClendon’s stock was sold it returned to a band of $15-20, with a brief dip below (40 day m/a is $16.65 and last night’s close was $17.44). The best comparable stock is Devon Energy (DVN) which consistently outperformed CHK despite a larger dividend at CHK, is slumping although over the past 6 months both are off 51%…over the past 12 months DVN is -57% while CHK is -62%.
Where is the corporate governance from the boards of directors? Is it lacking because as TB suspects they are all ‘good buddies’ with many serving on one anothers boards and often the compensation committee. You decide!
As TB asked of Angelo Mozillo at Countrywide: why does the founder get a retention bonus? Wasn’t this an apparent ‘repayment’ of his margin calls losses? Sounds about right…and definitely wrong! This is not what is meant by having ‘skin in the game!’
Similarly, why was Sandy Weill so grossly overpaid when he benefitted from the stock’s appreciation IF he was doing a good job which he most assuredly was not.
CNBC just keep getting worse and worse…they still believe in the myth of free market capitalism. Here again is the link TB provided yesterday to The Atlantic article by a former IMF chief economist. Many of you missed it…it is 12 pages of interesting, enlightening (to most people but merely confirmed what TB has suggested that the financial sector is in bed with the government and that has brought us and the rest of the world to the brink): http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200905/imf-advice
Adriana Huffington was a guest as was Rep. Barney Frank. Frank sensibly described what Congress is doing while Huffington with her own agenda kept hammering and yammering at Frank. She should stick to her blog as she sounded like Rep. Maxine Waters (who is now in trouble over obtaining federal funds for a minority owned bank her husband owns 250,000 shares in! Doesn’t anyone want the truth or are they just interested in their own beliefs. Huffington was talking about suspending mark to market as being a sham…while frank explained it clearly…three times, none to Huffington’s satisfaction…yet to TB and to others familiar with the banking industry it was perfectly logical…and it doesn’t cost the taxpayers a dime! Would Huffington like GOP Senators Shelby, Orin Hatch, Boehner, and others prefer to see the entire system fail? Because if we do what they suggest…which is nothing…they will succeed in doing just that!
Have a good day but remember it is quarterend!
TB
Trader Bill thinks it is clear to anyone reading these missives that they are merely commentaries…as he sees it…and do not necessarily reflect the views of anyone other than his own. Information is gathered from sources he has found reliable, but no guarantees of accuracy are implied. These are merely observations of events in the marketplace offering in an attempt to offer a non-mainstream viewpoint. Hope you find it useful. Copyright TBD Capital LLC, March 31, 2009.